Find out what is actually wrong with your website.
Paste an address. In about two seconds you get 18 real checks on speed, mobile, search visibility and whether a ready visitor can reach you — each one quoting what was found, and saying plainly why it matters.
Most website problems are cheap to describe and expensive to ignore. Handing over the list costs nothing and is the most useful thing this site can do for someone who never becomes a client.
It will not invent a crisis. A site that passes is told it passes, and a finding that does not matter for your business is marked as one worth leaving alone.
Send the report over. The reply says which items are worth paying for, which take an afternoon, and whether a rebuild is honestly the cheaper route.
What it reads, and what it cannot see.
A tool that overstates what it measured is worth less than no tool at all.
01Do I have to give an email address?
No. The whole report appears on the page. Asking for an address before showing someone a report about their own website is the kind of trick this studio argues against everywhere else, so it would be strange to build one here.
02What does it actually check?
It requests the page the way a browser does and reads the response: the certificate, the mobile viewport, the declared language, the title and description, the main heading and the heading order, image alt text, canonical and indexing directives, structured data, link-preview tags, the favicon, server response time, render-blocking scripts, HTML weight, compression, and whether there is any tappable way to get in touch.
03What does it not check?
It reads one page's HTML, so it cannot measure real Core Web Vitals from actual visitors, judge your design, read your copy, or crawl your whole site. It also does not run your JavaScript, so a site that renders entirely in the browser will look emptier here than it is. Anything outside what was in the response is left out rather than guessed at.
04Does it change anything on my site?
No. It makes one ordinary GET request, identifies itself honestly as JaySudhaStudioAudit in the user agent, and reads what comes back. Nothing is written, submitted, or logged in on your site.
05Is a low score a reason to rebuild?
Usually not. Most findings here are specific changes to an existing site, and the report says which ones are. A rebuild is worth discussing when the same problems keep coming back because of the platform underneath, not because a number looked low.
06Can I audit a competitor's site?
It only reads public pages, so nothing stops you. There is an hourly limit because a tool that fetches any address on request should not become a free scanner for anyone who finds it.